fbpx

Dr. Nour Bouhou

Vice President – Project Controls, ASLPM
Speaker, Adjunct Professor, Claims Expert, Regional Director of – AACE International

United States

About

Dr. Nour Bouhou, PSP, Vice President at ASLPM is a project management, project controls and construction claims and litigation expert.

She began her career as a Field Engineer working her way to serving as a Construction Consultant. In the field, she managed MEP, drywall, and finishes trades on new construction and renovation projects, in both the public and private arenas, on behalf of general contractors and developers. She coordinated safety, quality control and schedule progress via daily walks, subcontractor meetings and field directions.

As a construction and claims & litigation expert, she provides scheduling and change order evaluation services on large scale mixed-used projects, infrastructure projects, as well as military projects requiring DoD cost-loaded schedule reporting and time impact analysis requirement. In claims situations, she performs schedule delay analyses, productivity impact assessments, damages quantifications and serves as a testifying expert.

Dr. Bouhou provides technical trainings to owners and contractors related to scheduling best practices, project controls principles and claims. She published multiple technical and white papers and spoke at about 20 seminars and conferences.

Dr. Bouhou holds a PhD in Civil Engineering from The University of Texas at Austin in the Construction Engineering and Project Management Program.

She is an Adjunct Professor at California State University, East Bay and NKU College of Business, teaching Construction Management and Project Controls courses for the Undergraduate, Master’s and MBA Programs. She also serves as the Regional Director at AACE International and a program chair for the Western Winter Workshop.

To connect with Nour, please check her LinkedIn Profile.

Title & Abstract

How to Choose the Most Suitable Methodology to Assess Construction Schedule Delays?

Construction projects often experience schedule delays. Schedule delay experts often bear the burden of selecting the appropriate delay methodology to analyze and quantify schedule delays, and concurrent delay.

However, selecting the most adequate methodology remains a subject of controversy.

This presentation will walk through the different delay methodologies outlined in AACE RP 29R-03, and highlight the advantages and disadvantages of these methods, their sources validation protocols and try to establish a practical method to choose the adequate MIP.

While the industry seems to hold that dynamic methods are better suited for complex projects with longer performance periods, some experts hold that static methods can be used for simple projects with short performance periods for cost efficiency purposes.

In this presentation, you’ll explore how and why to select a schedule delay method.

Presentation Category:

  • Forensic, Claims, Dispute Resolution

Competency Level: Intermediate